Between Efficacy and Image: A Radical Inquiry into the Roots of the Yi Dao's Manifest and Subtle
This article offers an in-depth analysis of the core proposition of 'yao effecting and xiang imaging' in the Xici zhuan (Great Commentary) of the Zhouyi, examining the dynamic and static distinction between 'effecting' and 'imaging,' tracing the referent of 'this,' and elucidating how yao and xiang constitute the epistemological framework through which the Way of the Yi reveals the subtle and the manifest.

Chapter One: "The Yao Is That Which Effects This" — The Original Meaning of Xiao and the Generative Logic of Yao
I. The Archaic Semantic Field of Xiao (Effect)
To understand "the yao is that which effects this," we must first ask: what did xiao actually mean in the pre-Qin context$9
Xu Shen's Shuowen jiezi states: "Xiao: to image. Composed of pu (strike) and jiao (cross)." Duan Yucai's commentary further clarifies that the core meaning of xiao is "to imitate," "to model after," "to manifest." In archaic Chinese, xiao carries three layers of meaning worth noting:
First layer: to imitate, to model after. As the Shangshu (Book of Documents, "Yue ming," Part I) states: "Teaching and learning are each half the endeavor; keep beginning and end grounded in study." The essence of learning is to "effect" the Way of the former kings. In the Lunyu (Analects), the Master says: "I transmit but do not create; I trust in and love the ancient" (Shu er). "Transmitting" itself contains the meaning of "effecting" — modeling after.
Second layer: to manifest, to produce results. As in the Zuozhuan (Duke Xuan, Year 12): "There was effect." Meaning the affair produced verifiable results. This layer of meaning is especially crucial in the Xici zhuan — the yao is not merely "imitating" something, but actively "manifesting" something.
Third layer: to devote oneself, to render service. As in the Guoyu (Discourses of the States, "Jin yu"): "Those who render service as officials." Though this sense is not the primary thrust of our passage, it intimates the active agency inherent in xiao — not passive copying, but active reaching toward, investing in, and presenting.
Superimposing these three layers, we arrive at a composite understanding of xiao: The yao is the active imitation and dynamic manifestation of a certain foundational reality.
II. What Does "This" Refer To$10 — The Condensation of Heaven-and-Earth's Movement
What, then, is the "this" that the yao "effects"$11
The Xici zhuan (Part I) has already provided clear clues:
"Therefore the Yi contains the Supreme Ultimate (taiji), which generates the Two Modes, the Two Modes generate the Four Images, and the Four Images generate the Eight Trigrams."
And further:
"In heaven, images are formed; on earth, shapes are formed — and transformation and change become visible."
Consider also the preceding context in the Xici zhuan (Part II):
"The great virtue of heaven and earth is called 'generation'; the great treasure of the sage is called 'position.'"
Synthesizing these contexts, we see that "this" does not point to any single concrete thing, but rather to the entire dynamic process of yin and yang waxing and waning, of the myriad things being generated and transformed, between heaven and earth.
Han Kangbo's commentary states: "Xiao means 'to model after.' The sage models after the movements of heaven and earth and thereby produces the yao." Kong Yingda's Zhengyi (Correct Meaning) further elaborates: "The yao is that which effects the movements of all under heaven." This phrase, "the movements of all under heaven," is of paramount importance — it means that the yin-yang alternation of each individual yao is a miniature representation of some specific dynamic relationship within the cosmos.
Let us press the inquiry one level deeper: why xiao (effect) rather than zuo (create) or zao (fabricate)$12
This question touches upon an utterly fundamental proposition in the thought of high antiquity: the sage is not a creator but a modeler-after. The Xici zhuan (Part I) states explicitly:
"In ancient times, when Bao Xi ruled all under heaven, he looked upward and observed the images in heaven, and looked downward and observed the patterns on earth. He observed the markings of birds and beasts and the suitabilities of the land. Nearby, he took from his own body; afar, he took from the myriad things. Thereupon he first made the Eight Trigrams, to penetrate the virtue of the luminous spirits and to classify the conditions of the myriad things."
"Looking upward and examining downward" — this is a posture of cognitive humility. Fu Xi did not invent the Eight Trigrams from nothing; rather, from the order already manifest in heaven, earth, and all things, he extracted, imitated, and condensed the symbolic system of hexagrams and lines. The choice of the word xiao rather than zuo emphasizes precisely this: the authority of the yao derives not from human subjective construction, but from its faithful presentation of the Way of heaven and earth.
This resonates profoundly with the view of the Most High (Laozi). Chapter 25 of the Laozi states:
"Humanity models itself on earth, earth models itself on heaven, heaven models itself on the Dao, and the Dao models itself on what is naturally so."
"Models itself on" (fa) is equivalent to "effects" (xiao). From the Daoist perspective, the legitimacy of all standards and patterns derives from modeling after a higher order. When the Zhouyi uses the yao to "effect this," it is grounding this cosmological-level modeling in an operable symbolic system.
III. The Dynamic Essence of Yao: Not a Static Symbol but a Trajectory of Movement
Here lies a point easily overlooked: the reason xiao (effecting) rather than ji (recording) or zai (carrying) is used to define the yao is that the yao is essentially not a static record but a dynamic act of modeling.
The Shuogua zhuan (Discussion of the Trigrams) states:
"In ancient times, when the sages made the Yi, they intended to accord with the principles of nature and destiny. Therefore they established the Way of heaven and called it yin and yang; they established the Way of earth and called it yielding and firm; they established the Way of humanity and called it benevolence and rightness. Combining the Three Powers and doubling them, the Yi therefore uses six lines to complete a hexagram."
"Combining the Three Powers and doubling them" — heaven, earth, and humanity, each represented by a pair of yin-yang lines, combine to form six lines. The position of each line corresponds to a specific dimension of the relationship among the Three Powers. The first and second lines represent the Way of earth, the third and fourth the Way of humanity, the fifth and top lines the Way of heaven. The arrangement of the lines is not random but strictly models the structural order of the Three Powers.
More importantly, lines change. A yang line can change to a yin line, and a yin line to a yang line — this is the "changing line." It is precisely because the yao is a dynamic act of modeling that it can present the process of yin and yang waxing and waning between heaven and earth, rather than merely leaving a static snapshot.
The Xici zhuan (Part I) states:
"The firm and the yielding push against each other and generate transformation and change."
And further:
"Transformation and change are the images of advance and retreat. The firm and the yielding are the images of day and night."
The yin-yang alternation of the lines models the alternation of day and night, the waxing and waning of advance and retreat. This is a processual modeling, not a copying of results. This point is vital for understanding the Zhouyi as a whole — the Yi is not an encyclopedia of fixed answers but a "living" system that dynamically presents the process of change.